Meeting documents

Executive
Thursday, 31st March, 2016 7.30 pm

Date:
Thursday, 31st March, 2016
Time:
7.30 pm
Place:
New Council Chamber, Town Hall, Reigate
 

Attendance Details

Present:
Councillor V.W. Broad (Leader of the Council); Councillors Mrs N.J. Bramhall, J. Durrant, Dr L.R. Hack, A.J. Kay, G.J. Knight*, Mrs R. Mill and Mrs R. Renton.

* part of meeting only
Also Present:
Councillors Mrs R.H. Absalom, M. Blacker, S.T. Bramhall, J.C.S. Essex, K. Foreman, N.D. Harrison, M.J. Selby, B.A. Stead, C. Stevens, Mrs R.S. Turner and C.T.H. Whinney.
Min NoDescriptionResolution
Part I
97 MINUTES

RESOLVED that the minutes of the meeting held on 28 January 2016 be approved as a correct record and signed.

98 APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE

Executive Members: Councillors E. Humphreys and T. Schofield.


Non-Executive Members: Councillors J.M. Ellacott, R.C. Newstead and D.J. Pay.
 

99 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

Councillors V.W. Broad and Mrs R. Mill declared personal interests in item 10 Appointments to the Board of Banstead Commons Conservators. 

100 APPROVAL TO TENDER AND BUILD A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT ON PART OF THE TOWN HALL SITE

The Executive Member for Property and Regeneration, Councillor Mrs N.J. Bramhall, introduced the report referring to the Council owned Town Hall site and the Council’s strategy to identify opportunities to develop its sites and assets to maximise revenue income and/or capital receipts. 


The Council’s agents had highlighted that they had identified a national retailer, with a specific demand in for a retail offer in Reigate, that currently could not be fulfilled due to a lack of suitable units within the town. 
In line with the Council’s key principle of maximising its assets investigations had been carried about the possible use of the Town Hall site (which occupied a prime position within the town). This had concluded that a purpose built development could be delivered to meet the retailer’s requirements, which combined with 23 residential units, made the development viable and could be accomplished without significantly affecting Council operations.


The Executive considered the outline proposals of a mixed use development that, which if granted planning permission, would provide new retail provision within the town, improved service provision to local residents, workers and visitors, whilst allowing the Council to optimise use of its property assets.


The anticipated additional revenue from the proposed mixed use development would help to compensate for the reduction in Central Government funding for Local Authorities and would assist the Council’s desire to continue to deliver and maintain the level of services its residents currently enjoy. 


Comprehensive investigations had been undertaken into the viability of the development including:


• Valuation advice from Savills residential agents and the Council’s retained commercial agents; 
• Quantity Surveying advice on the construction cost for the scheme; and 
• Intrusive investigations into the ground conditions on the site. 


The results of those investigations revealed that the Council’s proposals were robust and that the risk was considered to be small and outweighed by the additional capital receipt and revenue income anticipated.
Councillor Mrs N.J. Bramhall and the Leader of the Council, Councillor V.W. Broad responded to Member questions on the following points: 

 

• Compatibility of the development with the Grade 2 listed status of the Town Hall; 
• Consideration of local retailers being attracted to the development; 
• Alternative options for the use of the site such as a turning area for buses as part of a Park and Ride scheme;
• The importance of ensuring a compatible design for the site;
• Consultation arrangements with residents and existing town centre retailers;
• Consideration of integrating the proposals with the existing retail area and improvements to the parking offer available;
• Research and the evidence base for the proposed development;
• Parking and access issues; and
• Impact assessment of the proposed development.

 

RECOMMENDED that Full Council make an allocation in the Capital Programme to fund this development based upon the costs set out in in the exempt information at Part 2 of the Executive’s Agenda.


RESOLVED that:
(i) the Head of Property Services be authorised, in consultation with the Executive Member for Property & Regeneration, to make the necessary professional consultancy appointments to commence and complete a mixed use construction project, comprising 23 residential units and a c. 857 sq m retail unit subject to all costs associated with the project not exceeding the budget (set out in the exempt information at Part 2 of the Executive’s Agenda);


(ii) the Head of Property Services be authorised, in consultation with the Executive Member for Property & Regeneration, to make a planning application for approval to build the mixed use development and to enter into any required planning obligations pursuant to any planning permission granted where it is possible to do so;


(iii) following a competitive tendering exercise, the Head of Property Services be authorised, in consultation with the Executive Member for Property & Regeneration, to enter into a construction contract with the successful contractor to complete the mixed use development, subject to the project costs not exceeding the budget (detailed in the exempt information at Part 2 of the Executive’s Agenda);


(iv) the Head of Property Services be authorised, in consultation with the Executive Member for Property & Regeneration, to conclude negotiations and enter into an Agreement for Lease and Lease with a National retailer based upon terms set out in Annex 1 in the exempt information at Part 2 of the Executive’s Agenda; and


(v) the Head of Property Services be authorised, in consultation with the Executive Member for Property and Regeneration, to agree the residential sales and individual transfer terms and subsequently enter into individual contracts for the sale of the constructed properties as private market residential dwellings. Subject to overall sale values being within the range set out in in the exempt information at Part 2 of the Executive’s Agenda.


Reasons for decision
To progress and maximise the development of Council owned sites as income producing assets and generating capital receipts and/or revenue income. To provide a new purpose built retail facility in the Town Centre by optimising the use of the Town Hall site. 


Alternative options
Proceed with the development of a retail store option only with a pre let agreement to a National Retailer; or
Retain the car parking on site in its existing configuration and create additional car parking spaces where the demolished South Annex used to stand and let all surplus spaces for contract parking. 
 

101 TREASURY MANAGEMENT STRATEGY 2016/17

Councillor G.J. Knight, Executive Member for Finance reported on the current position in relation to the adoption of the proposed Treasury Management Strategy for 2016/17. 


The report set out relevant statutory powers, issues (objectives, the current treasury position, matters for consideration and prudential indicators) legal, financial and equalities implications, risk management and other considerations, consultation undertaken and policy framework factors. The report had four Annexes:


• An Investment Strategy
• A Borrowing Strategy
• A Cash Management Strategy
• Risk Management Assessment


It was noted that the draft Strategy had been considered by the Executive in January 2016 and reviewed as part of the consultation by the Treasury Management Portfolio Holder Panel and by the Overview and Scrutiny Committee. As a result a wider variety of vehicles will be examined to increase returns on short-term, cash flow balances.


To comply with the Code of Practice on Treasury Management the Council has to approve annually prudential indicators and a Treasury Management Strategy that reflected the Council’s expected operations in this area for the 2016/17 financial year.


RECOMMENDED that the Treasury Management Strategy 2016/17 be approved.


Reasons for decision: To adopt a current Treasury Management Strategy for the 2016/17 period.

 

Alternative options: To not support the contents of this report or to defer it and ask Officers to provide more information and/or clarification on any specific points.
 

102 QUARTERLY PERFORMANCE REPORT (Q3 - OCTOBER TO DECEMBER 2015)

A report was submitted with financial monitoring information for the third quarter of 2015/16. The report also provided the headline issues on major variances in relation to the Council's overall performance for the period.
The Executive was informed that 9 of 11 key service indicators were on target or within agreed tolerances. The two below target were the percentage of major planning applications determined within 13 weeks and the percentage of planning appeals allowed by the Planning Inspectorate.


On the financial side, a year end underspend of £65,800 on the revenue budget was projected as a result of management action to eliminate the previously forecast overspend.


The capital budget was projecting an underspend of over £4.8m (22%), partly due to slippage in the redevelopment of the Court Lodge residential site and Merstham regeneration.


The Overview and Scrutiny Committee had considered the performance report at its meeting on 17th March 2016 and had no comments or issues to raise with the Executive on the current performance.
The report also provided the proposed new Key Performance Indicators and Strategic Risks for 2016-17.


RESOLVED that:


(i) the performance outlined in the report and the comments made by the Overview & Scrutiny Committee be noted; and
(ii) the new Key Performance Indicators (Annex 6) and Strategic risks for 2016-17 (Annex 7) be approved.


Reasons for decision:
To consider performance for the third quarter of the financial year 2015/16 and to ensure that the Council had appropriate arrangements in place for performance and risk management in 2016-17.

Alternative options:
Request further work to be undertaken on the new Key Performance Indicators and/or the Strategic Risk Register; or
Reject the new Key Performance Indicators and/or Strategic Risk Register and request that the existing performance indicators be retained.
 

103 OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY COMMITTEE WORK PROGRAMME 2016/17

A report was submitted with the proposed 2016/17 work programme for the Overview and Scrutiny Committee. The report set out relevant statutory powers, information on the work programme and how it had been prepared, resource, legal and equalities implications and consultation undertaken. The draft work programme was appended to the report.


The Leader of the Council, Councillor V.W. Broad informed the Executive that he and the Chief Executive had been consulted during the preparation of the work programme and that it delivered a good range of activities that were both achievable and adding value to the work of the Council.


The Committee had continued to recognise the increased pressures on the Council and had maintained a streamlined approach to its activities to ensure that its work programme reflected the Council’s priorities.


RECOMMENDED that the Overview and Scrutiny Committee work programme for 2016/17 be adopted.
 

Reasons for decision: To agree a work programme for the Overview and Scrutiny Committee for the 2016/17 Municipal Year.


Alternative options: To not adopt the Overview and Scrutiny Committee work programme for 2015/16.
 

104 DEBT WRITE OFF & RECOVERY PERFORMANCE

The Executive Member for Finance, Councillor G.J. Knight proposed that the Executive write off 12 debts. This proposal followed all possible action to recover these amounts.


Councillor Knight stated that the Council took debt recovery very seriously, that it would work with companies in difficulty to bring things to a satisfactory conclusion, but that all legal tools would be used to recover the debt until it became impossible or uneconomic to do so.


It was also emphasised that write off was essentially an accounting process to protect the Council against mis-statement of the accounts and that in all cases it was only recommended when all possible avenues had been exhausted. If further information was received or if the circumstances surrounding the debts changed then they would be pursued again.


The Executive noted that despite the proposed write offs; Reigate and Banstead remained a high performing Council in terms of debt recovery as reflected in Annex 2 to the report that showed the very good debt recovery performance so far in the financial year.


It was noted that a written response would be provided to a question from Councillor C.T.H. Whinney with regard to the implications of those residents who paid their Council Tax on a monthly basis in relation to the Council’s performance monitoring.


RESOLVED that:
(i) twelve debts totalling £116,619.26 (as detailed in Annex 1 of the Executive’s report) be approved for writing out of the Council’s accounts; and
(ii) the performance on debt recovery for the 2015/16 financial year be noted.


Reasons for decision
Seven of the debts related to National Non Domestic Rates (NNDR or Business Rates), and five related to Council Tax. All possible action had been taken to recover these amounts and approval was sought to technically write them out of the accounts.


Alternative options:

To not approve the proposed write offs.
 

105 AMALGAMATION OF THE LICENSING COMMITTEE AND THE REGULATORY COMMITTEE

The Leader of the Council, Councillor V.W. Broad reminded the Executive that in setting the Schedule of Meetings for 2016/17, Council had agreed the proposal of combining the existing Licensing and Regulatory Committees into one overarching committee dealing with all licensing matters.


The report presented to the Executive brought forward the necessary changes to the Constitution to support the establishment of this new committee structure for the 2016/17 Municipal Year and beyond.


The report sets out the proposed composition and terms of reference for the new Committee so that it could determine its own operational arrangements, including the continued arrangement of sub-committees which was known to work well.


Combining these Committees provided the opportunity to streamline the Council’s meetings and improve the expertise and governance for managing this function.


RECOMMENDED that:
(i) the terms of reference for the Licensing and Regulatory Committee (and Sub Committees) as set out in Annex 1 of the Executive’s report, be approved, to come into effect on 27 May 2016;
(ii) other consequential changes to the Constitution, as set out in Annex 1 of the Executive’s report, be approved, to come into effect on 27 May 2016;
(iii) the Licensing and Regulatory Committee be authorised to establish and appoint members to sub committees and to determine how it manages its business;
(iv) the Monitoring Officer be authorised to amend the Constitution accordingly; and
(v) all Councillors appointed to the Licensing and Regulatory Committee attend mandatory training at the start of every Municipal Year, before serving on any sub committee.


Reasons for decision:
To improve and strengthen the governance of the Regulatory and Licensing functions and provide a more efficient approach that allowed Members sitting on a newly created committee to develop an expertise across all areas of licensing.


Alternative option:
Request further work be undertaken to the proposed changes.
 

106 APPOINTMENTS TO THE BOARD OF THE BANSTEAD COMMONS CONSERVATORS

The Deputy Leader of the Council, Councillor A.J. Kay was appointed Chairman of the Executive for the consideration of this report following the declaration of interest by the Leader and the Executive Member for Leisure and Wellbeing Councillor Mrs R. Mill.


Councillor Kay indicated that the Executive in January 2015 delegated responsibility for the appointment of representatives to outside bodies to the Head of Health and Wellbeing (in consultation with the relevant Portfolio Holder and respective Group Leaders).


It was noted that the appointment of Board Members to Banstead Commons Conservators often included the nomination of non-members which it was considered should be a matter for the Executive to determine. The proposal was to revert to the arrangement whereby if the number of nominations received exceeded the number of vacancies, or where nominations came from non members, the matter be considered by the Executive for determination.


In line with the above proposal the report also presented details of two vacancies and the nominations received for these positions for a 3 year term.


The Executive noted the voluntary nature of the excellent work undertaken by the Conservators, which was much appreciated.


Note: Councillors V.W. Broad and Mrs R. Mill declared personal interests in this report and left the room for its consideration.


RESOLVED that:
(i) the process for appointing representatives to the Banstead Commons Conservators be changed to approve that, in the event that the number of nominations received exceed the number of vacancies, or where nominations come from non members, the matter be referred to the Executive for determination; and
(ii) the following representatives be approved for the two forthcoming vacancies on the Banstead Commons Conservators for a three year period:
• Dr J.H. Peacock and Mr J. McCrea.


Reasons for decision:
To implement changes to the current appointment process for the Banstead Commons Conservators adopted in January 2015 to take account of the nomination of non members and to determine the appointment of two representatives to the board in 2016.


Alternative options:
To continue to delegate this decision to the Head of Health and Wellbeing in consultation with relevant Portfolio Holder and respective Group Leaders.
Not to make any appointments and ask officers to seek new nominations.
 

107 MOTION FROM COUNCIL: CLIMATE LOCAL

Councillor V.W. Broad, Leader of the Council indicated that at the Council meeting on 17 December 2015 it was resolved to refer a motion on signing up to the Local Government Association’s Climate Local initiative to the Executive for consideration.


A report was presented that set out the context within which the Motion was proposed, following the recent Paris Climate Accord, and provided background information regarding the Climate Local initiative, including the costs and benefits to the Council.


The report set out the Council’s existing approach to supporting energy efficiency and carbon reduction and recommended that the continuation of this approach, without the need to commit to a further initiative which would require significant resources.


Councillor J.C.S. Essex, as the proposer of the original Motion, at the Leader’s invitation spoke in support of the Motion.


Following debate it was


RECOMMENDED that:
(i) the Council not commit to the Local Government Association’s Climate Local initiative at this time;
(ii) the Council’s existing approach to support carbon reduction / energy efficiency within its own estate through mainstream services, and the promotion of energy efficiency schemes to local residents and businesses within a Surreywide partnership, be noted; and
(iii) further consideration be given to this issue under the review of the 5 Year Plan, currently scheduled for 2017.

Reasons for decision:
The Council has previously delivered significant activities in this area, and continues to support countywide activities, as well as deliver improvements to our own estate and promote opportunities to our local residents and businesses through mainstream activities.
Committing to a further initiative would require significant resources and is not consistent with our 5 Year Plan priorities.


Alternative options:
Sign up to Climate Local, and commence work to develop a Climate Local Action Plan or to take no action in relation to this issue.

108 STATEMENTS

None.

109 ANY OTHER URGENT BUSINESS

None.

110 EXEMPT BUSINESS

RESOLVED that members of the Press and public be excluded from the meeting for the following items of business under Section 100A(4) of the Local Government Act 1972 on the grounds that:


(i) it involves the likely disclosure of exempt information as defined in paragraph 3 of Part 1 of Schedule 12A of the Act; and
(ii) the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information.
 

Part II(Confidential)
111 APPROVAL TO TENDER AND BUILD A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT ON PART OF THE TOWN HALL SITE
  • (Attachment: 10)Item 15: Part 2 - Town Hall Site Development Approval (340K/bytes)

RESOLVED that the exempt information relating to the proposals to build a mixed use development on part of the Town Hall site be noted.

The meeting closed at 8.33 pm